Skip to content

Modern Slavery Statements

BusinessReviewed by Civil Help editorial team: 21 February 2026Next review: 8 June 20275 min
Verified against 4 sources
  • Modern Slavery Act 2015 s.54
  • Home Office Transparency in Supply Chains guidance (2017)
  • Procurement Act 2023
  • GLAA enforcement guidance

The Modern Slavery Act 2015 requires larger UK businesses to publish an annual transparency statement setting out what steps they have taken to ensure their supply chains and operations are free from modern slavery and human trafficking.

Key points

  • Businesses with a global annual turnover of £36 million or more and operating in the UK must publish an annual Modern Slavery statement.
  • The statement must be approved by the board, signed by a director, and published on your website.
  • There is no financial penalty for failing to publish, but non-compliance is publicly listed and can damage reputation and procurement opportunities.
  • Smaller businesses are not legally required to publish a statement but should still consider their supply chain risks.

Who Must Publish a Statement?

Section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 requires commercial organisations that supply goods or services, carry on part of their business in the UK, and have an annual turnover of £36 million or more to publish a slavery and human trafficking statement for each financial year. The obligation extends to parent companies on behalf of subsidiaries that do not individually meet the threshold.

The Home Office maintains a public registry where statements must be submitted. The statement must be published on your company website (with a prominent link in the homepage footer) and submitted to the registry each year. While there is currently no direct financial penalty for non-compliance, the government has indicated its intention to introduce penalties and has publicly named non-compliant companies.

What the Statement Must Cover

The Act specifies up to six areas a statement may cover — the government's guidance strongly recommends addressing all of them:

  1. Organisation structure and supply chains — what you do and who your key suppliers are
  2. Policies in relation to slavery and human trafficking
  3. Due diligence processes for identifying and addressing risks
  4. Risk assessment — identifying higher-risk parts of your supply chain
  5. Key performance indicators and how effective your policies have been
  6. Training provided to staff

The statement must be approved and signed by a director (or equivalent) and approved by the board. Statements that say "we have found no issues" without any evidence of due diligence are increasingly criticised by investors and NGOs as inadequate.

Smaller Businesses: Good Practice Without the Mandate

If your business does not meet the £36 million threshold, you are not legally required to publish a statement. However, you may be asked to provide evidence of your anti-slavery approach by large customers who are required to publish statements about their supply chains — if you cannot demonstrate compliance, you may lose contracts.

Good practice for any business regardless of size includes: having a basic modern slavery policy; conducting proportionate due diligence on high-risk supply chains (e.g. those involving overseas manufacturing, labour-intensive industries, or complex subcontracting); training relevant staff; and having a mechanism for workers or suppliers to report concerns. The Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA) can provide guidance for higher-risk sectors.

Enforcement, Penalties, and the Procurement Angle

The Modern Slavery Act 2015 currently imposes no direct financial penalty on companies that fail to publish a statement. However, the enforcement landscape is shifting. The government has repeatedly announced its intention to introduce civil penalties for non-compliance with section 54, and the Home Office publicly names companies that are required to publish but have not done so. Reputational damage and exclusion from public procurement are the most immediate practical consequences.

On procurement, the Procurement Act 2023 (which came into force in February 2024) strengthened public sector buyer obligations to consider supplier conduct on social value, including modern slavery risks. Contracting authorities now have explicit powers to exclude suppliers from procurements on the basis of grave professional misconduct — which can include persistent failure to address modern slavery risks in supply chains. This is particularly significant for businesses that depend on government contracts.

Beyond statutory compliance, institutional investors, large corporates, and ESG-focused buyers are increasingly using modern slavery statements as a screening tool. Statements published on the Home Office registry are publicly searchable. The quality of your statement — how specific it is about risks found, actions taken, and KPIs — is scrutinised by NGOs such as the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, which publishes annual rankings of statement quality for major companies. Even below the mandatory threshold, proactively publishing a voluntary statement can demonstrate responsible sourcing to clients and investors.

The Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA) has investigative and enforcement powers for labour exploitation offences. For higher-risk sectors — agriculture, horticulture, shellfish gathering, food processing, construction, and cleaning — the GLAA can investigate supply chains and prosecute offences under the Modern Slavery Act independently of whether a company has published an adequate statement. Serious cases can result in convictions carrying unlimited fines and up to life imprisonment for perpetrators.

Frequently asked questions

Does the threshold apply to UK turnover or global turnover?
The £36 million threshold applies to <strong>global annual turnover</strong> — the total consolidated turnover of the business worldwide, not just UK revenue. This catches large multinational businesses even if their UK turnover is below the threshold. The organisation must also supply goods or services and carry on part of its business in the UK.
What happens if we cannot find any issues in our supply chain?
A statement saying "we have conducted due diligence and found no issues" without explaining the process is considered inadequate. The statement should describe what you have actually done — supplier questionnaires, audits, contractual clauses, worker surveys — and what you found. If you genuinely have low risk, explain why. Investors, NGOs, and procurement teams are increasingly scrutinising statement quality.
What are the most common modern slavery risks in supply chains?
Higher-risk factors include: operations or suppliers in countries with weak labour laws; industries with seasonal or migrant labour (agriculture, construction, hospitality, textiles); complex or long supply chains with limited visibility; and use of labour brokers or gangmasters. Common indicators of modern slavery include workers paying recruitment fees, workers sharing accommodation provided by employers, and excessive deductions from pay.
Will we lose public contracts if we do not publish a statement?
Potentially, yes. The Procurement Act 2023 (in force from February 2024) gives contracting authorities greater powers to exclude suppliers on the basis of grave professional misconduct, which can include persistent failure to address modern slavery risks. Even before exclusion, many public sector buyers require evidence of a published and adequate statement as part of pre-qualification. Failing to publish when required is also publicly listed by the Home Office, which procurement officers are increasingly checking.
How long does a Modern Slavery statement need to be?
There is no minimum or maximum length specified in the Act. However, the Home Office guidance and the statement registry template suggest covering all six recommended areas (structure, policies, due diligence, risk assessment, KPIs, and training). Statements that are one paragraph long and simply assert compliance without substance are considered inadequate. Most well-regarded statements from companies of similar size run to 2,000 to 5,000 words and include specific examples of due diligence activity and supplier audit results.

Official bodies and resources

Companies House

Government

Incorporates and dissolves limited companies, registers company information, and makes it available to the public.

HM Revenue & Customs

Government

Responsible for collecting taxes, paying some forms of state support, and administering national insurance.

Was this page helpful?

Disclaimer

This information is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal advice. You should seek qualified legal help if your situation requires it.